IT Operations · Engineering, IT & AI
Should you build or buy Cloud Infrastructure (IaaS)?
Cloud Infrastructure (IaaS) provides on-demand compute, storage, and networking resources over the internet, letting organizations run applications and workloads without owning physical servers. AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Platform are the dominant providers; smaller clouds like Hetzner and DigitalOcean serve specific cost and geographic needs.
The build-vs-buy decision for Cloud Infrastructure turns on whether your workload profile is predictable and large-scale enough to justify the capital investment and engineering specialization required to operate your own hardware — as Dropbox and 37signals have done — or whether the operational simplicity and flexibility of hyperscaler pricing covers your economics; the decision has been stable for most teams but shifts at specific workload types.
- Domain
- IT Operations
- Function
- Engineering, IT & AI
- Industries
- Cross-industry
Last assessed June 2026 · re-scored quarterly via The Continuum.
Build it, buy it, or bridge?
| Build it | Buy it | Bridge (buy, then extend) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost shape | Significant upfront capex for hardware; low per-unit compute cost for steady-state workloads | Pay-as-you-go; budget providers (Hetzner, DigitalOcean) competitive for steady workloads | Colocation or private cloud for predictable workloads; public cloud for burst and variable demand |
| Time to value | Months to years to stand up owned infrastructure at meaningful scale | Compute available in minutes; no procurement, shipping, or racking required | Public cloud baseline immediate; private capacity added as workloads mature |
| Differentiation captured | Predictable cost at scale; specific hardware configurations (GPU density, storage ratios) | No differentiation — pure utility; competitive advantage happens above the infrastructure layer | Cost optimization on known workloads; flexibility retained for growth and experimentation |
| AI feasibility today | OpenStack and CloudStack are production-proven; requires specialized infrastructure engineering | Hyperscalers provide managed GPU instances; neocloud providers (CoreWeave, Lambda) offer 3-6x lower GPU cost | Public cloud for training experimentation; owned or neocloud for high-volume inference |
| Who it fits | Hyperscalers, telcos, sovereign cloud operators, and large enterprises with data residency requirements | The vast majority of SaaS and product companies; anyone without dedicated infra engineering | Companies with large steady-state compute alongside variable development and staging needs |
When building Cloud Infrastructure (IaaS) makes sense
Running your own IaaS infrastructure makes economic sense in a narrow set of situations. Dropbox saved roughly $75 million over two years by moving predictable storage workloads off AWS. 37signals trimmed about $1 million annually by returning to owned hardware for steady-state compute. Those outcomes are real, but they represent specific workload profiles — large, predictable, storage-heavy or compute-heavy — not general conclusions. OpenStack and Apache CloudStack are mature, production-proven platforms used in telcos, sovereign cloud operations, and large enterprise private clouds. If your organization has specialized infrastructure engineering capacity, data residency requirements that limit hyperscaler options, or GPU-intensive workloads where neocloud providers offer three to six times the cost efficiency of on-demand hyperscaler pricing, the case for owning or colocating hardware is worth a serious calculation.
When buying Cloud Infrastructure (IaaS) makes sense
Buying public cloud IaaS is the right call for the overwhelming majority of product teams. Pay-as-you-go pricing removes the capital commitment and operational burden of owning hardware, and budget providers like Hetzner and DigitalOcean make the economics accessible for workloads that don't need hyperscaler scale or feature breadth. The competitive advantage for most companies comes from the applications and data running on the infrastructure, not from the infrastructure itself. The refactoring cost to migrate specific services off cloud, combined with the ongoing engineering cost of running hardware, typically erases the apparent savings for teams without dedicated infrastructure specialists. About 85% of workloads stay on public cloud rather than repatriating, which reflects where the economics actually land for the median organization.
AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Platform are the platform. The build case here means running OpenStack or Apache CloudStack, which is a real and documented choice for telcos, sovereign cloud operators, and large enterprises with specific data-residency or cost profiles. Dropbox saved roughly $75 million moving off AWS for predictable storage workloads. 37signals trimmed about $1 million annually by returning to owned hardware for steady-state compute. Those numbers are real, but they represent specific workload profiles, not general conclusions.
For the vast majority of product teams, the buy case is obvious and the economics are sound. Pay-as-you-go pricing and budget providers like Hetzner and DigitalOcean keep the floor accessible. The calculus shifts when your workload is predictable enough to benefit from owned hardware, your engineering team has the infrastructure specialization to operate it, and the refactoring cost of moving specific services is justified by the long-term savings. GPU compute is the current exception, where specialized cloud providers offer three to six times the cost efficiency of hyperscaler on-demand pricing for the right workloads.
Representative vendors
B4 Pro
Get B4's actual call on Cloud Infrastructure (IaaS)
- → B4's call for Cloud Infrastructure (IaaS): Build, Buy, Bridge, or Beware
- → The five-dimension scorecard and the scoring rationale
- → All 5 vendors with pricing and positioning
- → Quarterly re-scores that feed the MCP live, so your agents always query the current call
- → MCP server plus API and SDK access, and CSV/JSON export
Prefer to read first? The book covers the framework end to end.
Frequently asked
- What is Cloud Infrastructure (IaaS)?
- Cloud Infrastructure (IaaS) provides on-demand compute, storage, and networking resources over the internet, letting organizations run applications and workloads without owning physical servers. AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Platform are the dominant providers; smaller clouds like Hetzner and DigitalOcean serve specific cost and geographic needs.
- When does building Cloud Infrastructure (IaaS) make sense?
- Building — running OpenStack or owned hardware — makes sense for organizations with large, predictable workloads, specialized infrastructure engineering capacity, and data residency requirements. Dropbox and 37signals are the most cited examples of companies that saved significantly by repatriating specific workloads.
- When does buying Cloud Infrastructure (IaaS) make sense?
- Buying makes sense for virtually all product teams. Public cloud removes the capital commitment and operational burden of hardware ownership, and the flexibility to scale up or down without procurement is worth the premium for variable or unpredictable workloads.
- What are the main Cloud Infrastructure (IaaS) vendors?
- Representative vendors include Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform, AWS, Hetzner / DigitalOcean. B4 Pro scores the full set.
- Are neoclouds worth considering for AI workloads?
- Specialized cloud providers like CoreWeave and Lambda Labs offer GPU compute at three to six times lower cost than hyperscaler on-demand pricing for the right AI workloads — primarily inference and training that doesn't need the full hyperscaler service catalog. For high-volume, predictable AI compute, neoclouds are worth a direct cost comparison.
More in IT Operations
The Build Report
Bi-weekly analysis of software categories through the B4 Framework. What to build, what to buy, and how to use AI to make better decisions for your company.