B4 Index Pro
Reading the live index…
B4 Index Pro
Reading the live index…
Every category is placed on two axes, then scored on five dimensions.
BUILD — your competitive edge · high differentiation + high AI feasibility
The category differentiates you competitively, and the evidence makes building a scoped capability realistic. Test the business case and your capacity to run it. Teams should build the software that gives them competitive advantages.
This workflow could give your company an advantage, and independent production builds support the scope you need.
BUY — let someone else own this · low differentiation + low AI feasibility
Low differentiation, hard to build. This may be commodity infrastructure or a category with significant compliance and operating demands. SaaS exists for many good reasons. Choose the best fit at a sensible total cost, and check that those reasons still apply to you.
The vendor provides infrastructure, operating capability, or controls that would be costly to reproduce.
BRIDGE — buy the platform, build the edge · high differentiation + low AI feasibility
The category differentiates you, but the evidence doesn't support building the whole capability for your needs. Buy the platform and build the parts that make your business different. Buy and extend can be the right long-term answer.
The platform does useful work. Its APIs and data access let you add the workflows that are yours.
BEWARE — the ground is shifting · low differentiation + high AI feasibility
Beware is a warning that you may be overpaying for something that already exists. A focused build or a capability inside a tool you already pay for could replace what you use. Test the replacement, its full cost, and the migration before canceling anything. What's the difference between Beware and Build? It's differentiation.
Compare the renewal with a narrower build, a cheaper vendor, or a capability you already own.
Where a category lands comes from two axes, each on a 1–5 scale, split by a line at 3.5:
An axis counts as high only above the line — in practice, at 4 or above. BUILD = both high · BRIDGE = X high, Y low · BEWARE = X low, Y high · BUY = both low.
The three quadrant-deciding dimensions are read as ranges, not points: one step either side of what each scored, equal weight on all three values. Enumerating all 27 combinations gives a scenario share for each of the four calls. The one holding the most is the call. A split like BUY 67 · BEWARE 33 reads as: 67% of those readings land on Buy, and 33% land on Beware — the shares measure sensitivity to nearby ratings, not project success or expected savings.
Methodology v4.0 — August 2026. Full framework →
Urgency = average of Vendor Value and Cost Trajectory (High ≥3.5, Medium 2.5 to <3.5, Low <2.5).
Vendors are first-class in the index: 20,925 vendors are mapped to the categories under the scores.
Categories move, and the index logs every move. The Continuum tab at the top of this app holds the full movement history: every verdict change the scoring engine has recorded, newest first, filterable by landing verdict and domain, with the reasoning expandable on each row. Whole-index methodology passes are tagged so organic market movement stays distinct.
The public /continuum page shows the 20 most recent moves and the engine's status; this tab is the complete record.