Home / Directory / Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS) / PocketBase vs Supabase

Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS) · Head to head

PocketBase vs Supabase

Both products compete in Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS). Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS) platforms provide a managed, hosted backend stack — database, authentication, file storage, real-time subscriptions, and server-side functions — through client SDKs, so teams can build applications without provisioning or operating underlying infrastructure. BaaS platforms like Supabase and Firebase replace what would otherwise be months of infrastructure setup. Here are the facts the B4 Index maintains on each, side by side.

The two files, side by side

What it is
Single-binary open-source BaaS with embedded SQLite, Auth, storage, and realtime
Build production-grade applications with a Postgres database, Authentication, instant APIs, Realtime, Functions, Storage and Vector embeddings. Start for free.
Pricing
Free (open source, self-host)
Free; Pro $25/project/mo; Team $599/org/mo; self-host free
Categories served
Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS)
Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS)
Status
Active · verified June 2026
Active

The decision underneath the comparison

Choosing between PocketBase and Supabase assumes you're buying Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS) at all. That's the prior question, and the B4 Index scores it on two axes: how much Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS) differentiates you, and how far AI has come at building it. Read the build-versus-buy considerations for Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS) before you shortlist either product.

Vendor facts are maintained independently of any B4 verdict and re-verified on a monthly liveness check. See the full methodology.