Home / Directory / Applicant Tracking System (ATS) / Greenhouse vs Lever

Applicant Tracking System (ATS) · Head to head

Greenhouse vs Lever

Both products compete in Applicant Tracking System (ATS). An Applicant Tracking System (ATS) manages the end-to-end hiring process — job postings, candidate sourcing, application intake, interview scheduling, offer management, and the compliance record around hiring decisions. Recruiting teams use it as the operational hub that connects sourcing channels, hiring managers, and the HRIS that receives new hires. Here are the facts the B4 Index maintains on each, side by side.

The two files, side by side

Greenhouse
Lever
What it is
Greenhouse is more than your typical ATS recruiting software, powered by built-in AI recruiting tools to streamline sourcing, hiring and talent management.
ATS + CRM hybrid, strong nurture campaigns
Website
greenhouse.io ↗
lever.co ↗
Pricing
$6K-30K/year
$4K-20K/year
Categories served
Applicant Tracking System (ATS), Learning Management System (LMS)
Applicant Tracking System (ATS), Learning Management System (LMS)
Status
Active
Active
The Greenhouse file → The Lever file →

The decision underneath the comparison

Choosing between Greenhouse and Lever assumes you're buying Applicant Tracking System (ATS) at all. That's the prior question, and the B4 Index scores it on two axes: how much Applicant Tracking System (ATS) differentiates you, and how far AI has come at building it. Read the build-versus-buy considerations for Applicant Tracking System (ATS) before you shortlist either product.

Vendor facts are maintained independently of any B4 verdict and re-verified on a monthly liveness check. See the full methodology.